of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Richard Myers
Briefing on Operation Enduring Freedom
October 7, 2001
2:45 P.M. EDT
RUMSFELD: Good afternoon.
We've said since Tuesday, September 11th that the campaign against terrorism
will be broad, sustained, and that we will use every element of American influence
and power. Today the president has turned to direct overt military force to
complement the economic, humanitarian, financial and diplomatic activities which
are already well underway.
The effect we hope to achieve through these raids which together with our coalition
partners we have initiated today, is to create conditions for sustained anti-terrorist
and humanitarian relief operations in Afghanistan. That requires that among
other things we first remove the threat from air defenses and from Taliban aircraft.
We also seek to raise the cost of doing business for foreign terrorists who
have chosen Afghanistan from which to organize their activities and for the
oppressive Taliban regime that continues to tolerate terrorist presence in those
portions of Afghanistan which they control.
The current military operations are focused on achieving several outcomes:
To make clear to the Taliban leaders and their supporters that harboring terrorists
is unacceptable and carries a price.
To acquire intelligence to facilitate future operations against al Qaeda and
the Taliban regime that harbors the terrorists.
To develop relationships with groups in Afghanistan that oppose the Taliban
regime and the foreign terrorists that they support.
To make it increasingly difficult for the terrorists to use Afghanistan freely
as a base of operation.
And to alter the military balance over time by denying to the Taliban the offensive
systems that hamper the progress of the various opposition forces.
And to provide humanitarian relief to Afghans suffering truly oppressive living
conditions under the Taliban regime.
I want to reiterate a point that President Bush has made often, and that he
made again today in his remarks. [ White House transcript ]
The United States has organized armed coalitions on several occasions since
the Cold War for the purpose of denying hostile regimes the opportunity to oppress
their own people and other people. In Kuwait, in Northern Iraq, in Somalia,
Bosnia, and Kosovo the United States took action on behalf of Muslim populations
against outside invaders and oppressive regimes. The same is true today.
We stand with those Afghans who are being oppressed by a regime that abuses
the very people it purports to lead and that harbors terrorists who have attacked
and killed thousands of innocents around the world of all religions, of all
races, and of all nationalities.
While our raids today focus on the Taliban and the foreign terrorists in Afghanistan,
our aim remains much broader. Our objective is to defeat those who use terrorism
and those who house or support them. The world stands united in this effort.
It is not about a religion or an individual terrorist or a country. Our partners
in this effort represent nations and peoples of all cultures, all religions,
and all races. We share the belief that terrorism is a cancer on the human condition
and we intend to oppose it wherever it is.
The operation today involved a variety of weapon systems and it originated from
a number of separate locations. We used land- and sea-based aircraft, surface
ships and submarines, and we employed a variety of weapons to achieve our objective.
As President Bush mentioned in his statement, dozens of countries contributed
in specific ways to this mission including transit and landing rights, basing
opportunities and intelligence support. In this mission we are particularly
grateful for the direct military involvement of the forces of Great Britain.
To achieve the outcomes we seek it is important to go after air defense and
Taliban aircraft. We need the freedom to operate on the ground and in the air
and the targets selected, if successfully destroyed, should permit an increasing
degree of freedom over time.
We have also targeted command facilities for those forces that we know support
terrorists elements within Afghanistan and critical terrorist sites. President
Bush has repeatedly emphasized that we will hold accountable any who help terrorists
as well as the terrorists themselves.
Before I take your questions let me say that to say that these attacks are in
any way against Afghanistan or the Afghan people is flat wrong. We support the
Afghan people against the al Qaeda, a foreign presence on their land, and against
the Taliban regime that supports them.
What took place today and what is taking place in the period ahead is a part
of the measured and broad and sustained effort that the president announced
shortly after the attack on September 11th. [ White House transcript ]
General Myers, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will make a few remarks
before we respond to questions.
MYERS: Thank you, Mr. Secretary.
I know you have many questions to ask so I'll keep my comments brief.
The secretary said today our forces have begun the initial part of military
operations in the war against terrorism. About 15 land-based bombers, some 25
strike aircraft from carriers, and U.S. and British ships and submarines launching
approximately 50 Tomahawk missiles have struck terrorist targets in Afghanistan.
The first target was hit at approximately 12:30 EST (sic) [EDT] and operations
continue as we speak.
As the secretary said, these efforts are designed to disrupt and destroy terrorist
activities in Afghanistan and to set the conditions for future military action
as well as to bring much-needed food and medical need to the people of Afghanistan.
I want to remind you that while today's operations are visible, many other operations
may not be so visible. But visible or not, our friends and enemies should understand
that all instruments of our national power as well as those of our friends and
allies around the world are being brought to bear on this global menace.
We are in the early stages of ongoing combat operations and our outstanding
men and women in uniform are performing just as they've been trained to do,
and that is to say, superbly.
With that, ladies and gentlemen, we're ready to take your questions.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, might I ask, I know you don't want to give too many details
especially early on. You said 15 land-based bombers approximately -- could you
tell us whether B-1s, B-52s and B-2s were used in this?
RUMSFELD: They were.
QUESTION: B-2s were used. And did you, we're told you hit a broad range of targets.
Did you hit air bases? Did you attack Taliban jets and air bases?
RUMSFELD: As I indicated in my remarks, it is certainly necessary if one is
going to engage in humanitarian activities that involve the air or the ground,
that one would not want to try to do that as long as the Taliban had aircraft
or air defense systems that could pose a threat to U.S. personnel.
QUESTION: One brief follow-up. Were the B-2s flying round trip from the United States
as they did in the Kosovo operations?
MYERS: Yes, they flew from the continental United States.
QUESTION: Can you tell us how extensive the humanitarian effort has been thus far,
and how many C-17s' worth of various types of refugee food and blankets and
medicine are you dropping? Is there some way to quantify it?
RUMSFELD: It started 20 or 30 minutes ago and is just in its beginning stages.
QUESTION: Can you give us some description of how many tons of food and medicine you're
trying to deliver?
RUMSFELD: We could. As I say, it's in the beginning stages and this is a first
day. The first day was something like 37,000 -- as I recall, 37,500. But whether
or not that will all get delivered is something we won't know for a few hours.
QUESTION: That includes more than just food, is that correct?
RUMSFELD: It does include some medicines and that type of thing.
QUESTION: General Myers, can you give a sense, the weapons being dropped from the bombers,
the secretary said this is not an attack against the Afghani people, that would
be flat wrong. That presupposes we're using precision guided weapons to avoid
casualties. All three of those bombers you mentioned can drop the JDAM [joint
direct attack munition] satellite bombs. Is that the sort of ordnance being
MYERS: We are using, or essentially have at hand, all our conventional munitions.
But you're right, Tony, a majority of them are precision weapons, but not exclusively,
because some targets, we try to match targets and weapons and their effects.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, you said and General Myers said that the raids have been ongoing
now for about 2.5 hours using 50 TLAMs [Tomahawk land attack missiles]. One
would assume that there is an end to this initial phase. Can you tell us if
this initial phase is going to go on much longer? Or is it for all intents and
purposes as on this --
RUMSFELD: It is not yet over.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, was Osama bin Laden targeted in this raid? And can you give
us, understanding that it's still early, any preliminary assessment of how successful
these attacks have been?
RUMSFELD: No, it's far too early to try to measure success, and the answer is
no with respect to him. This is not about a single individual. It's about an
entire terrorist network and multiple terrorist networks across the globe.
We would not have actual reports on the success of the various attacks for some
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, are the air drops that have begun, will that be a continuous
operation or is this a one-time effort?
RUMSFELD: The president's approach to this is that it will be continuous, but
that it will be broadly based and it will be economic and political and diplomatic
as well as military, overt and covert. The fact that one sees a cruise missile
on television at one moment and does not at another moment ought not to suggest
that the pressure and the President's approach to this is anything but continuous.
It is continuous.
QUESTION: The humanitarian part -- I was referring to the air drops. Is that going
RUMSFELD: I don't quite know what continuous means. Twenty-four hour days, seven
days a week? No. Unlikely. On the other hand once there is an opportunity to
begin the humanitarian effort on the ground I suppose it could be characterized
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, can you give us any idea whether or not this is, I know it's
still ongoing, but is this essentially a one-day operation in this phase, or
will it, should we expect there will be more activity tomorrow? And the second
part, will the United States impose essentially a no-fly zone over Afghanistan
as it did over Bosnia and Iraq in the past?
RUMSFELD: I think rather than trying to characterize what the United States
is going to do on any given day in advance, that I would prefer to say that
this effort will continue in a variety of different ways over a sustained period
of time, and that we intend to pursue it until such time as we're satisfied
that those terrorist networks don't exist. That they have been destroyed.
QUESTION: A no-fly zone?
RUMSFELD: I don't know that I'd want to characterize it as that, although certainly
one would think that if one of your early objectives is to deal with their aircraft
and their air defense systems, it very likely would reduce the number of Taliban
aircraft flying around over Afghanistan, I would hope. Yes.
QUESTION: Have you seen any response so far from the Taliban military? Have they flown?
Have they launched anything --
RUMSFELD: It's too early to know.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, the Taliban has basically (inaudible) that Osama bin Laden
is still alive as well as Mohammed Omar. What would you say to them about that
sort of a boast?
RUMSFELD: Well, the Taliban since the beginning of this have been rejected every
suggestion, request or demand made by the United States of America and the coalition
partners. They have established themselves as being firmly connected to al Qaeda
and the foreign presence in their country. They've made a choice. And I don't
know that there's anything to say beyond that. They are what they are, and they're
bringing great harm to the Afghan people.
QUESTION: Can you say anything about the Northern Alliance? Was this coordinated with
them? Are they picking up any ground as a result of this? Or are they linking
up with U.S. forces? Can you give us any sense of what's going on on the ground?
RUMSFELD: Sure. There are a number of elements on the ground in Afghanistan,
Afghan people in the Northern Alliance, in the tribes in the south, even some
within Taliban that do not favor Omar and do not favor the al Qaeda and would
wish they were no longer in their country.
Certainly our interest is to strengthen those forces that are opposed to al
Qaeda and opposed to the Taliban leadership that is so intimately connected
to them, and to strengthen all of those forces so that they will have better
opportunities to prevail and to deal with what obviously is a regime that is
enormously harmful to the Afghan people and poses threats to people all across
this globe including the United States of America.
QUESTION: Do you plan to put ground troops in Afghanistan?
QUESTION: -- as you've said many times from the podium, there just aren't that many
targets in Afghanistan. Apparently you found some. Can you explain that? And
also can you address what seems to be somewhat of an anomaly in this mission,
the idea that you're fighting your way in in order to drop humanitarian relief
on people. And if the people, if the places where you're dropping relief, if
you're getting shot at there, are you not essentially dropping relief on the
RUMSFELD: First with respect to the targets, I think I've said repeatedly from
this podium that there are not a lot of high value targets. I pointed out that
the Taliban and the al Qaeda do not have armies, navies and air forces, and
that's clear. They don't. I've therefore characterized this conflict, this campaign,
this so-called war, as being notably different from others. And it means that
what we have to do is exactly what I said in my earlier remarks. We have to
create the conditions for a sustained effort that will assist those forces in
the country that are opposed to Taliban and opposed to al Qaeda and we have
to do it in a variety of different ways. We have to dry up their bank accounts.
We have to bring political, diplomatic pressure to bear on them. We have to
bring economic pressure to bear.
And to the extent we can use overt as well as covert activities to improve target
information, to gather intelligence that will enable us to be more precise in
what we do, and to force people to move and change what they're doing, to raise
the cost of what they're doing, to attempt to reduce the number of people around
the globe who support them and finance them, all of that helps.
The fact is in this battle against terrorism there is no silver bullet. There
is no single thing that is going to suddenly make that threat disappear. Ultimately
they're going to collapse from within and they're going to collapse from within
because of the full combination of all of the resources from all of the countries
that are brought to bear on these networks. That is what will constitute victory.
QUESTION: General Myers, ground troops. Have you --
QUESTION: Will you be providing arms and air cover to the opposition forces to strengthen
them and --
RUMSFELD: As I say -- our goal is to make them more successful. Getting into
exactly how we'll do that, I think I'll defer.
QUESTION: Do you plan to put U.S. ground troops into Afghanistan?
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, you said a moment ago, you spoke of multiple terrorist networks
in multiple countries. Is this phase of the operation going to involve strikes
in some other places other than Afghanistan?
RUMSFELD: As you know, we've had a policy here, at least during my tenure, where
we don't discuss ongoing operations and we don't discuss intelligence matters.
QUESTION: Do you plan to put U.S. ground troops into Yugoslavia?
QUESTION: Would you please describe the Taliban anti-aircraft, the AAA surface-to-air
missiles, and have any of the American aircraft been damaged or brought down?
RUMSFELD: We have no information that any American aircraft has been brought
down at this moment, at least prior to the time I walked in here. As I believe
Dick Myers has pointed out, they do have a limited number of surface-to-air
missiles and they have more than a limited number of man-operated, man-mobile
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, could you give us a sense of how many targets you've hit
RUMSFELD: There is no way to discuss the outcome of this operation.
QUESTION: Are U.S. forces on the ground in Afghanistan now? And more broadly, can you
illuminate at all the so-called less visible side of this operation?
RUMSFELD: Not really. If we wanted it to be overt, we would have discussed it.
QUESTION: And the ground forces, please?
QUESTION: My first part was, are there U.S. forces on the ground in Afghanistan?
RUMSFELD: If we had, how to phrase this so that it's perfectly clear again.
We have not -- we've got -- I'm disinclined to talk about things that are in
process, and if we had significant numbers of U.S. military on the ground, it
would have been known by now.
QUESTION: Do you plan to send troops --
QUESTION: -- air drops, is that predicated on some level of confidence that you've
taken out at least some of that air defense threat?
RUMSFELD: We certainly would not be using air drops in portions of the country
where we were not satisfied that it would be safe, for humanitarian relief purposes.
We don't discuss operational activities.
QUESTION: Can you tell us is there any plan to send significant numbers of --
RUMSFELD: I answered the question before you asked it. (Laughter) We do not
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, much of the country is at least controlled now by the Taliban.
Does that mean, and most of the refugees actually or internally displaced people
are in those sections of the country. Does that mean that those areas will not
get the relief as quickly? That other non-Taliban held areas will get it more
RUMSFELD: Certainly non-Taliban areas would get it more quickly.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, can we define a little bit about the humanitarian air drops?
Are these going to be for the most part high altitude air drops? Are you going
to use pallets and parachutes? Or just kick them out the way we did over Kosovo
MYERS: It's more like the latter, but greatly improved. We know the effectiveness
of those air drops was less than desired, so between now and then they have
been working with the delivery means to improve that. We think we can be fairly
effective from high altitudes, and we're targeting remote locations where it's
difficult to get trucks in. This has all been coordinated very well with USAID
[U.S. Agency for International Development].
QUESTION: To follow up, you're not just kicking out the rations, though, by themselves.
They're coming down via parachute or some means to the ground? Or are they?
MYERS: No, the delivery mode is pretty much like you described. A little more
sophisticated than that, but it's not by parachute.
QUESTION: Is there a danger imposed to the people on the ground that you're trying
to help as the humanitarian aid comes in? Are you exposing them to fire? Or
are these two operations wholly separate?
RUMSFELD: There is no risk to the people on the ground that would have an interest
in receiving the humanitarian drops.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, were C-17s used to drop these humanitarian daily rations today?
And if so, how many?
MYERS: There were two C-17s planned today to drop humanitarian...
QUESTION: That was 100 percent of what was carrying the HDRs [humanitarian daily rations]?
MYERS: For the first day, that's correct.
Question: How can you drop them from a high altitude -- I mean this is a lay
person's question, without using parachutes and not destroy them?
MYERS: The system has been designed to do just that. And like I said, they've
been testing ever since Allied Force stopped. Shortly after that we began testing
to make sure we could accurately deliver these, and that's been ongoing. We
have high confidence that we'll be able to put them where we want to put them.
QUESTION: -- so that they --
QUESTION: General, do they have precision radars that can map an area to drop within
a certain bullseye?
MYERS: Let me just go back. We have high confidence they'll be able to drop
where the intended Afghan citizens are, and there are several ways to do that.
QUESTION: As part of the effort today are you dropping leaflets? Have you begun radio
broadcasts from Commando Solo and some of the other assets that you have that
can do directed messages to the people who may not understand what you're doing?
QUESTION: Both of those?
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, are you asking sir, the (inaudible) governments or you waiting
for the defeat of Taliban?
RUMSFELD: That really is the business of the Department of State. What we are
doing is we are attempting to help those and advantage those that oppose Taliban
and oppose al Qaeda in that country in a variety of different ways. How that
might evolve and what that might mean from the standpoint of the future of Afghanistan
it seems to me is a good distance off, and it is not an issue that this department
really is involved in.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, are additional steps being taken to strengthen security in
the United States in anticipation of some hostile retaliation for this attack
RUMSFELD: Well, most of the kinds of attacks that we've seen tend to have been
planned months and months and months and in some cases years in advance. So
the idea that any attack that could occur now, would conceivably characterize
as in retaliation for something I think would be a misunderstanding of the situation.
The United States is, as President Bush has indicated, is on a state of heightened
awareness. The armed forces around the world are on a state of higher alert
than is normal. The forces in the United States are on a higher alert than has
been the normal pattern for our forces, and the various organizations that deal
with law enforcement in the United States, the FBI and state and local officials
are certainly aware that as of September 11th we have to be sensitive to the
possibility that there can be various types of terrorist attacks in our country.
As a result the president has marshaled a great many of the capabilities of
the United States government including the military to assist in seeing that
we do what is possible.
But the only way to deal with these terrorist threats is to go at them where
they exist. You cannot defend at every place at every time against every conceivable,
imaginable, even unimaginable terrorist attack. And the only way to deal with
it is to take the battle to where they are and to root them out and to starve
them out by seeing that those countries and those organizations and those non-governmental
organizations and those individuals that are supporting and harboring and facilitating
these networks stop doing it and find that there's a penalty for doing it.
QUESTION: -- there were strikes in Kandahar and Kabul and there's talk about the electricity
system going down. Are you running the risk of being characterized as attacking
the Afghan people rather than military targets?
RUMSFELD: You know, in this world of ours if you get up in the morning you're
running a risk of having someone lie and someone mischaracterize what it is
What the United States of America is doing is exactly what I said. It is attempting
to defend the United States by taking this battle to the terrorists that have
killed thousands of Americans and that threaten not just the United States but
regimes throughout the world because they are determined to find ways to intimidate
the rest of the world and to terrorize the rest of the world, and we are determined
not to be terrorized.