House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer
White House Briefing Room
October 29, 2001
12:46 P.M. EST
MR. FLEISCHER: Good afternoon. Let me give you a report on the President's day,
then I have several announcements pertaining to some meetings and visits. The
President this morning spoke with Bangladeshi Prime Minister Zia. The President
congratulated the Prime Minister on her election victory, and thanked her for
supporting the global coalition against terrorism. He also conveyed condolences
to Prime Minister Zia over the loss of the many Bangladeshi citizens at the
World Trade Center. The President stressed the importance of showing respect
for the Muslim faith in America, as well as around the world.
The President also spoke to Tanzania President Mkapa this morning. The President
thanked President Mkapa for his support of the anti-terrorism coalition, and
acknowledged the common work of the United States and Tanzania in the terrorism
fight since the bombing of the embassy in Dar es Salaam in 1998. President Mkapa
stated that Tanzanians fully support the coalition.
The President convened a meeting of the National Security Council this morning.
He also traveled to the State Department to participate in a forum on the African
Growth and Opportunity Act. This was a forum designed to promote trade with
sub-Saharan African nations and the United States, as a result of legislation
that the President signed earlier this year, that has led to an increase in
trade by some 17 percent compared to last year with sub-Saharan Africa, something
the President thinks is very important for the development of the African continent.
The President also this afternoon at 2:00 p.m. will convene a meeting of the
Homeland Security Council. And at that meeting, the President is going to announce
creation of a foreign terrorist tracking task force. The purpose of this is
to have a way for the agencies to work together to prevent aliens who commit
or support terror from entering the United States. The President will also direct
these agencies to work together to locate, detain, prosecute or deport any aliens
who may already be here. So this will be stepped-up enforcement.
Several announcements. President Bush will welcome President Abdelaziz Bouteflika
to the White House on November 5th. That's the President of Algeria. The President
also -- I have an announcement concerning Japan -- welcomes Japan's actions
today to provide forces for surveillance, transport and other support short
of direct combat operations in the war on terrorism. Japan is already playing
an active role in diplomacy, information sharing and humanitarian assistance.
This newest contribution demonstrates the enduring strength of the U.S.-Japanese
Four more. President Bush will travel to New York to attend the general debate
of the United Nations General Assembly on November 10th through 11th. The General
Debate was postponed from September due to the terrorist attacks. While in New
York, the President will deliver a speech to the United Nations, attend a lunch
hosted by Secretary General Annan, and host a number of meetings with world
leaders. One of those meetings with world leaders will include President Musharraf
of Pakistan, who will meet with the President on November 10th, while the two
are up in New York.
And in an update on some activities at the agencies dealing with the consequences
of the terrorist act, and actions that will be taken to help America regain
its footing and normalcy. Secretary Evans this morning hosted the first meeting
of what's called the Tourist Policy Council. It's the first meeting since 1997.
Secretaries of Transportation, Labor, Interior and HUD, along with the Small
Business Administration and the Immigration and Natural Services attended. The
reestablishment of this commission follows recommendations made by the travel
and tourism industry to the White House following the attacks on September 11th,
as a way to help the travel and the tourism industry recover.
Secretary O'Neill, at the Department of Treasury today, addressed a special
session of what's called the Financial Action Task Force. That's a group of
29 nations that work together to develop guidelines for money laundering around
the world. The Secretary encouraged the task force to devote its experience
to disrupt the misuse of the international financial system by terrorists and
those who channel funds to them.
In his remarks, the Secretary suggested three goals: one, the establishment
of international standards for combatting terrorist financing; two, to ensure
that not only task force members, but all countries come into compliance with
the standards; and, three, that regular reports be issued on the success in
identifying taking action against terrorist financing.
To date, more than 150 countries are cooperating in the financial war against
terrorism. More than 80 blocking orders have been issued by various nations;
$24 million has been blocked.
And I'm more than happy to take questions. Ron Fournier.
QUESTION: Despite the previous briefing, there's still some confusion over the
cases we have today. Can you tell us what you know about the identification
of anthrax on the Supreme Court building, where it was found and how much of
it. The Cohen Building, where exactly is that? What agency has authority over
it? And tell us what you know about what was found and how much was found?
MR. FLEISCHER: The information from Health and Human Services, to the best of
my knowledge, was obtained today. It's a preliminary test result, and so the
Department of Health and Human Services is going to continue to review what
they have found. It's a preliminary positive. Additional tests are being done
QUESTION: It's Cohen?
MR. FLEISCHER: That's correct. The Cohen Building is the Department of Health
and Human Services.
QUESTION: Is that the mail room?
MR. FLEISCHER: I do not recall if Secretary Thompson indicated it was mail room
or some other facility. I do believe it was the mail room, however.
The Supreme Court, as you know, was a remote facility that was found at the
Supreme Court. They have a remote mail processing center. And your third question?
QUESTION: There are reports of -- the Supreme Court, that was actually found
in the building, I assume. You haven't been brought up to date on that yet?
MR. FLEISCHER: I've not heard those reports.
QUESTION: What about the State Department?
MR. FLEISCHER: The State Department, I would refer you to State to get additional
details on that. My understanding is it involved mail that was received at a
remote facility across the street from the State Department that was brought
into the State Department, into the mail rooms at the State Department.
QUESTION: Ari, so it was contaminated mail that was brought into the mail room
of the State Department?
MR. FLEISCHER: That appears to be what it is. That's correct, Randy. Yes, Secret
Service knew about that prior to the President going over there. It did not
pose any problem for the President or his traveling party.
QUESTION: Prior to September 10th, did the U.S., either through administration
officials or intermediaries, have any discussions with Taliban representatives
about turning over Osama bin Laden for trial?
MR. FLEISCHER: Terry, the only reports I'm aware of -- and you may want to check
deeper with the State Department because when it comes to diplomatic communications
with other entities they would have more information -- but the only one I'm
aware of, it was a matter of routine for the United States, working through
Pakistan, to talk to the Taliban about the conditions of the Americans who were
held in Afghanistan for preaching Christianity. There have been contacts on
that. Anything beyond that, I do not know.
QUESTION: So, as far as you know, as part of those contacts there was no discussion
about turning over bin Laden?
MR. FLEISCHER: No, I'm referring you to State, because that's the only information
I have on the topic.
QUESTION: Ari, is it the administration's belief that there is at least one
more letter out there somewhere that's causing a lot of this contamination?
MR. FLEISCHER: It's a possibility. I wouldn't characterize anything as the President's
belief or not. One of the things the President has stressed is to pursue the
facts wherever they may take us, and then to inform people. But, clearly, that
is a theory that investigators have, that it may be more than one letter.
QUESTION: Ari, I want to ask you -- the Cohen Building has two departments in
it. It has the Health and Human Services on one side, and it's got the Voice
of America and WorldNet Television on the other side. Are you saying that the
mail room of the Health and Human Services --
MR. FLEISCHER: I'm saying that the Secretary of Health and Human Services informed
me about it immediately prior to Governor Ridge's briefing, so information is
on its way in. And I'm sure the Department will have additional information
with specifics as soon as it's available.
QUESTION: Ari, can you give us any more specifics on this task force, exactly
if you're moving to restrict immigration in some way?
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, it's designed to learn some of the lessons about what happened
on September 11th, in which, obviously, aliens entered the United States for
the purpose of engaging in terrorism. And so the task force is going to work
with the various agencies that are involved to try to find that rightful balance
between America remaining a nation that is open and welcoming to immigrants,
while making certain that terrorists are not able to take advantage of our openness
and the fact that we are and must remain a free society, and enter the country.
That's the purpose.
QUESTION: What kind of restrictions could we see in the future?
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, they're going to be working on a series of recommendations.
The Governor will be announcing, along with the President, the creation of this
task force today, and you'll just have to wait and see what the task force specifically
comes up with.
QUESTION: In view of the nation's plight, is the President really supporting
rebates to the tune of billions of dollars for the biggest corporations in this
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, I'm not sure that I would characterize what is pending
on the Hill in that exact manner. The President has proposed an economic stimulus
plan that includes helping businesses so they don't get penalized for saving
and investment in new plants and new equipment. And as you know, the tax code
right now has a perverse incentive that punishes companies that invest in new
plants and equipment. It's called the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax. And
as a result of the President's --
QUESTION: So he is supporting billions in rebates for these corporations?
MR. FLEISCHER: The President's proposal dealt with it on a prospective basis.
QUESTION: Ari, for a President who says he does not like the issue of profiling,
and he stood next to Muslim Americans and Arab Americans -- doesn't this immigration
task force somewhat promote the idea of profiling?
MR. FLEISCHER: No, not at all. It promotes the idea of catching terrorists.
And that will be the goal of this task force, to make certain that terrorists
are not able to enter our country.
You know, our country has had successes catching terrorists. I would refer you
to the Millennium Project, where terrorists tried to infiltrate to take action
domestically against the United States and its citizens on New Year's Eve 1999,
turning the corner to 2000. The government was successful in catching people.
On September 11th, obviously attacks got through. It's very important for the
American people that the government dedicate the proper amount of resources
and the proper diligence, while maintaining our open policies as a nation, as
we move forward. And that's the purpose.
QUESTION: A follow-up to that. We keep hearing about this millennium -- how
things were thwarted. Could you give a specific example of what was thwarted?
Because many people are saying that it was basically nothing happened, there
MR. FLEISCHER: Exactly.
QUESTION: I mean, nothing happened because nothing was going to happen. And
the federal government is saying it was thwarted. What was thwarted?
MR. FLEISCHER: Let me, on that, refer you to the FBI -- will be more than happy
to give you the details of what it was.
QUESTION: Ari, does the President this week have any plans on meeting with any
of the postal workers here, in New Jersey, in New York? He's met with SES people
and other people --
MR. FLEISCHER: All I can say is we'll keep you advised of his schedule.
QUESTION: Ari, on the task force, is the goal of the task force to apply a tighter
screening, to take enforcement action, or just to make recommendations on what
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, the task force is getting created today. And so as the
task force meets and comes out with its recommendations, I wouldn't be surprised
to see if it's a series of both type things. It will be some concrete actions
that agencies can take unilaterally. There may be legislative proposals that
they suggest to the Congress. I think it would be likely to be some combination
of the both. It just depends on what recommendations they come up with.
QUESTION: Do you have any feeling for how serious this problem is? I mean, they
talked to, what, 500 people in this investigation. Do you feel like those 500
people are linked to terrorism and maybe shouldn't be here, or is it just, say,
the 19 that were involved?
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, it is a problem in that we are an open society, and the
President is determined to make certain we remain an open society, and he wants
to make certain that we are a society that continues to welcome immigrants.
But there's a balance that must be found, while welcoming immigrants, because
they strengthen our country, and always have, making certain that we make sure
that any loopholes are closed so that people who would do harm to the United
States, who are on known terrorist lists, for example, are not allowed into
QUESTION: When you said a minute ago that the President's proposals on economic
-- tax breaks for corporations dealt with them on a prospective basis, does
that mean he does not support the proposals on the Hill to give retroactive
tax breaks? And I have a follow to that.
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, I think it's all going to depend on what comes out in the
final mixture of the conference committee. I don't think the President is prepared,
at this point, to go down every ticker of the proposals that are on the Hill.
As you know, they all get lumped together into one big package. And presidents
don't have line-item vetoes. They have to look at a package in its entirety.
And that's what the President looks forward to doing.
But the point is that the President strongly supports, this fall, enactment
of legislation that will help get the economy moving again. This is a very important
economic week for the country. A series of reports are going to come out this
week on the gross domestic product for the third quarter, the preliminary estimate
of it. There will be additional information on Friday about unemployment for
And the President does not think that Congress should go home without addressing
fixing our economy and giving it a boost, so people don't lose their jobs, and
providing that stimulus.
QUESTION: And, secondly, on that front, how confident is the President that
giving money to corporations will help get the economy going, when he, himself,
has identified demand as one of the problems? He's out there telling us to go
spend money --
MR. FLEISCHER: First of all, it's not a question of giving money to anybody.
Taxes in this country are made by the people who earn them. And so they send
their money into the government. And when the government gives it back, that's
letting people keep the money that they themselves made, whether they are a
corporation, a small business, and individual.
And the package the President sent up to the Congress, after some $55 billion
worth of spending was done by Congress, with the President's support, now the
President has proposed a package of a similar number that would focus on tax
cuts, including tax cuts for low to middle income people who don't pay income
taxes, but who do pay payroll taxes. That would accelerate some of the income
tax rate cuts that were scheduled for 2006 and 2004 to go into effect faster,
as well as help the businesses. Because let me remind you that when businesses
buy plant and equipment, that helps create jobs for the people who make that
plant and equipment.
QUESTION: But is there any evidence that they'll do that, given that consumers
aren't buying at the level the President desires?
MR. FLEISCHER: It's always a combination of both. And that's why the President's
plan helps to stimulate demand by giving individuals tax rate reductions, while
helping businesses, so they have incentives to invest in new plant and new equipment,
and thereby hire workers.
QUESTION: On the foreign terrorist tracking task force, what are the lines of
authority there? Who is going to chair that? What will Governor Ridge's role
be in that?
MR. FLEISCHER: There will be a fact sheet distributed at the time of the announcement,
and that will answer all the questions. I don't have it with me.
QUESTION: If I could follow on that, Ari. You pointed out that the government
was able to stop a series of incidents over the millennium. I'm wondering if
the goal of foreign terrorist tracking task force might be to deal with immigration
policy that -- for example, Mohammed Atta, we understand, could have been denied
entry into the country. Would you expect recommendations that concern immigration
policy in addition to dealing with people we already suspect are terrorists?
Presumably, we have the laws to do that.
MR. FLEISCHER: Their charge is to focus on terrorists. And, of course, they
will do so with an overview of the fact that the nation must remain a country
that is welcoming to immigrants and is an open society.
We, historically, have benefitted in fighting wars from the work that immigrants
have done for our country. And so the President is very cognizant of that, and
the President wants to make sure that as we move to make certain terrorists
don't enter the country and that if any terrorists are found here, we're able
to take proper action. He wants that done in the context of being a nation that
continues to be open.
QUESTION: So you would not expect recommendations that deal with immigration
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, we'll just have to wait and see what they do, Wendell.
QUESTION: Ari, on that point, Governor Ridge told us a few moments ago that
all options should be on the table and when talking broadly about immigration,
he didn't in any way, discourage us from thinking that student visas, political
asylum, some other means of access to this country through the immigration system
might very well be a big part of what the task force considers and makes changes
MR. FLEISCHER: Sure. As I indicated, we'll just have to see what the task force
comes up with.
QUESTION: Is the President generally concerned about misuse or the improper
use of student visas, political asylum, other means of access to the country
where people overstay their legal --
MR. FLEISCHER: The President is concerned about any which way that somebody
could come into this nation as a terrorist and commit terrorist acts, regardless
of what way they're able to slip in.
QUESTION: Is the White House dealing with the airlines in terms of, there have
been so many instances in this country where, if you have dark skin and you're
on a plane, you could be ejected because the stewardess doesn't take a liking
to you. So many. What are you doing about that?
MR. FLEISCHER: Helen, I think there is no question that the President has made
a determined effort from day one when he visited a mosque to remind the American
people about the need to remain an open and tolerant society.
As I indicated before, many people who have helped us to win wars we've fought
before were immigrants to this nation. And they are just as American as everybody
else who has been in this nation maybe one day, or one generation, or five generations
longer than they have. So it's always a question of balance.
QUESTION: Is there a contact with the airlines to put a halt to this?
MR. FLEISCHER: I think everybody has heard the President's message. And let
me remind you, too, that the government has prosecuted people who, in the mailing
of anthrax, conduct hoaxes, and I'm not aware of anybody saying that we're not
going after people because of one background of somebody. That is a broad effort.
Anybody who breaks the laws of this country needs to be found and needs to be
punished. And that's the President's approach.
QUESTION: Laura Bush has said recently that she was offered and refused vaccines
and precautionary antibiotics for bioterrorism. Given her openness, can you
tell us yet whether the President has been offered any of these?
MR. FLEISCHER: I'm not going to go beyond anything the President indicated last
QUESTION: Ari, on the task force, how soon does the President want the recommendations?
And will there be any policy -- will there be an interim policy while he awaits
MR. FLEISCHER: I've not heard a specific definition on it. That may come out
in the fact sheet. And so the event will be -- that's a pool event at the bottom.
And so the press will have access to the meeting and access to all that information.
Also can't give it all out now, because otherwise you might not come to the
event. So it's a little after 2:00 p.m.
QUESTION: Does the President have any plans to travel to New York in the next
MR. FLEISCHER: As always, we will keep you posted of the President's travels.
And I just do want to remind you that the White House will be forthcoming, provide
travel information. And until then, I have not given any indications.
QUESTION: Are there any special or growing concerns about Pakistan? Musharraf
has pushed us to stop bombing by Ramadan. We know that there are people amassed
on the border, saying they want to go in and help the Taliban. As well there
are questions about the Pakistani intelligence service, and have they been helping
the Taliban. Are there growing concerns here, or anything special that you're
doing as it relates to Pakistan, to keep them in the coalition?
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, President Bush has always been working very closely, since
the beginning of this, with President Musharraf. And the Secretary has been
in touch -- Secretary Powell has been in regular touch. The President will continue
to have close cooperation with Pakistan, to work with them as we together fight
terrorism. It's a volatile region, of course, and the stability of the region
is very important. And that's always foremost in the minds of the planners,
and of the people who are conducting the policies.
QUESTION: Ari, is the administration at all looking into the possibility that
some industries, some companies have taken advantage of the current economic
climate to fatten the number of people they are laying off?
MR. FLEISCHER: Actually, if you heard in the President's remarks last week in
the East Room, I think the President went out of his room, I think the President
went out of his way to note that there were several industries that have kept
people working. And they serve as examples to other industries who are able
to keep people on the payroll at this time of difficult economic circumstances
throughout the country.
The President recognizes that the private sector has a right to make hiring
and firing decisions. But the President did compliment the auto industry for
the actions that they are taking.
QUESTION: Has the administration looked into the possibility of price gouging
in the fuel situation earlier this year? Does it have any plans to look into
the possibility of what I posed there, that some companies are taking advantage
of this to cut their payrolls?
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, price gouging is an entirely different topic, and that
remains an issue that the United States government has a series of agencies
set up to make certain that does not occur. It's notable then, despite the fact
that we do have volatility in the Middle East, the price of oil has come down.
QUESTION: But what about the employment rolls? Is there any effort to see --
MR. FLEISCHER: I would refer you to what the President said last week. The President
expressed himself very clearly, complimenting those industries that have taken
those steps. But again, in this country, the government is not the entity that
does all the hiring and firing.
QUESTION: Well, do you think any companies have taken advantage of this to cut
their job rolls?
MR. FLEISCHER: Again, I'll just refer you to what the President said last week.
I think he addressed it.
QUESTION: The Japanese parliament passed legislation to authorize the dispatch
of the self-defense forces overseas, to provide logistical support for the U.S.
MR. FLEISCHER: Right.
QUESTION: Any reaction from the White House? Does the President believe that
Japan's non-combat action would make any difference in this military campaign?
MR. FLEISCHER: You must have had a very important meeting, because I addressed
that at the top of my briefing, in a statement.
QUESTION: Ari, it is likely that the economic stimulus bill in the Senate is
going to look quite different from the bill -- the House. I'm wondering if the
President has laid out any realistic markers yet that would guide a conference
committee beyond the sort of general statements that you've been making the
last few days?
MR. FLEISCHER: What I think you're seeing is a healthy process working. This
is the way our system works. The House passes legislation, the Senate passes
legislation, as is their prerogative to do. And the President looks forward
to the Senate passing it; he hopes they will.
There is a possibility they won't do it this fall, and the President thinks
that would be a very bad mistake that would hurt workers at a time they need
help. So --
QUESTION: He sure is not going to be a passive observer,
MR. FLEISCHER: I think what's important is that bill make it to conference.
That typically is the way that presidents have been able to work the closest
and work the best with the Congress. But the first step is for the Senate to
The President clearly did lay out the four components of what he believes a
stimulus package should be; I walked you through them earlier in the briefing.
So, he has laid out the parameters, he has laid out his principles with several
specifics, four specifics, and now it's up to the Senate to act.
QUESTION: Ari, prior to September 11th, the President appeared to be leaning
to liberalize the immigration laws, particularly in regard to establishment
of the guest worker program of Mexico. Is that dead now, and particularly in
light of current atmosphere?
MR. FLEISCHER: No, it's not dead. But, clearly, the two principal people who
were involved in drafting the new immigration policy to Mexico are Attorney
General Ashcroft and Secretary of State Colin Powell. And as a result of the
war and as a result of the anthrax and other duties that both of them have,
it has not moved at the pace the President had hoped it would move, and I think
QUESTION: Ari, on the truck issue, since September we haven't heard really very
much about what the President wants to do on Mexican trucks coming into the
country, full operations by January.
MR. FLEISCHER: The President's position on allowing Mexican trucks into the
country remains the same as it was, that it's important for the trucks to be
operating safely in the United States, for them to enter legally, and for the
government to hire additional inspectors on the borders. So that way, they can
inspect the trucks.
QUESTION: Would you look at some kind of a phase-in now rather than just trying
to get --
MR. FLEISCHER: The action now is in the Congress, and the President is hoping
that Congress will take action.
QUESTION: Ari, as we head into the flu season, can you tell us exactly what
the administration wants the American people to do? On Friday, Secretary Thompson
said that they didn't want younger, healthier people running out to get the
flu vaccine in order to avoid confusing symptoms with anthrax.
And over the weekend there were reports that they did want everyone to get vaccinated,
even more urgently than in years past. There's some confusion here. Can you
tell us exactly what the administration wants --
MR. FLEISCHER: Those judgments will be made by the appropriate health officials
and people working with their individual doctors. That's not the type of statement
you should expect to come from the White House podium.
QUESTION: Ari, last week, the President said he wanted to see checks mailed
to people who didn't get one this summer. The IRS Commissioner says, that's
impossible. Is the President still committed to that, or is he willing to wait
several months or have that money rolled over into tax refunds next year?
MR. FLEISCHER: The point the President is making is, he believes it is important
to get tax relief to low- to middle-income people, people who do not pay income
taxes, but who do pay payroll taxes. And the President has offered that in the
proposal that he has sent up to the Hill. He believes that that will -- that
rebate value of that check will have a stimulative effect on the economy, just
as it did for upper-income workers. But the President is flexible on the exact
means by which that can be accomplished.
QUESTION: Ari, the task force is focused on foreign non-citizens -- immigration
and whatnot. Does this mean that you believe that the source of these attacks
-- say, anthrax attacks -- are foreign and not domestic? And what will the administration
do about, say, homegrown terrorists, like white supremacy groups, et cetera?
MR. FLEISCHER: Right. No, it's no indication one way or another about whether
the President thinks the anthrax attacks are foreign or domestic. As you've
heard repeatedly, the government has not been able to rule out or in whether
the source is domestic or foreign.
But the President does know that the terrorists have entered our country illegally,
and in some cases legally. And he wants to make certain that if somebody is
a known terrorist, they should not get access to American soil.
QUESTION: How about the homegrown groups, Ari, the white supremacists and what
not? Are they also under the domain of this tax force, or --
MR. FLEISCHER: No, the task force deals with immigration. But, clearly, the
FBI, in its efforts to target and to find and to prosecute, to arrest those
who are responsible, or the person who is responsible for the anthrax attacks,
are looking everywhere domestically, as well as internationally. And whoever
did it, the President believes will get arrested for murder, and will be tried.
QUESTION: Ari, two of the parameters the President set for the stimulus package
also seem to be agreed upon by Senator Daschle. Both believe that any final
package should be short-term, and should be stimulative.
Two specific provisions in the House bill, capital gains provision and the rebate
for AMT credit have been criticized for not meeting those tests. Would the President
sign a bill that contains those two provisions, even if they're questionable
in terms of meeting the test
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, the first task is to get this bill to the conference. And
the President wants to make sure that the Senate takes action. Obviously, nothing
can get to Congress and there can be no stimulus to help the economy if the
Senate doesn't take action. So that must come first, and then the President
will work with the Congress. You know what his four principles, his four specifics
are. The President would like those to be what he can sign. But he also recognizes
that Congress doesn't do everything Presidents say.
QUESTION: Also, on the anthrax issue.
MR. FLEISCHER: On the which issue?
QUESTION: The anthrax issue.
MR. FLEISCHER: Yes.
QUESTION: Given how it's considered one of the most menacing public health issues
we've had in the United States, why has the Surgeon General not had a more prominent
role in addressing this issue?
MR. FLEISCHER: I believe the Surgeon General has had a prominent role. I've
seen him on several of the TV shows. There have been many people who have been
playing a big role, including the director of the NIH was on this weekend, as
well. So I think the government is calling on the advice and the expertise of
a host of people.
QUESTION: Treasury Secretary O'Neill said Friday that the economy has almost
gotten back to where it was on September 10th, though the economic data was
mixed. And he said it was poised to begin a rebound in the first quarter of
2002. Does the President share that rather optimistic attitude about where the
economy is right now? And, if so, what's the need for a stimulus?
MR. FLEISCHER: Well, Major, the President makes no such predictions, because
the President is not an economist. But there is a growing body of evidence in
the economic world that would have previously been called a U-shaped recovery,
which kind of comes down not as low -- lack of economic growth, and then it
takes its time to come back up, may indeed be a V-shape, where it goes down
to even a lower amount of growth, and then it comes back up sharper and faster.
There's a growing body of economists who believe that may be the case. But,
again, the White House doesn't engage in the prediction business.
QUESTION: Can I just follow-up, Ari? There will be an announcement shortly here
about the 2001 fiscal budget surplus, estimated to be down about $30 billion.
Mitch Daniels has said next year we're going to be in real, unified deficits.
How big a deficit problem does this country face, considering all the things
that have to be done, in federal spending, dealing with September 11th?
MR. FLEISCHER: I think it's too soon to say. I think it's very likely that the
information released later today about the size of the surplus for 2001 is going
to show that the government has enjoyed the second-largest surplus in the history
of this country. It is less than it was in 2000, but it still remains the second-largest
Clearly, the President wants to have growth. Growth, the President believes,
is the answer to building surpluses back up. The President knows that an economy
that's growing at 3 percent, 4 percent, 5 percent a year fills the coffers of
the Treasury Department; and that's how you get out of any deficits and back
into surpluses if deficits emerge.
QUESTION: Ari, back on immigration. So are you going to move on a two-tracks
here -- moving to liberalize immigration for Mexico, but restricting it in other
ways, or are you just going to let the earlier effort sort of go on the back
burner for a while?
MR. FLEISCHER: Again, I think it's just too soon to say. The President hasn't
even announced the task force yet. And so -- I wanted to share it with you;
he hasn't even announced it yet. I think you just have to let the task force
get up and running.
QUESTION: Is the President going to meet with Chairman Arafat in New York when
he goes to New York?
MR. FLEISCHER: As always, if we have anything to announce, we'll let you know.
QUESTION: And then a follow-up on that. Foreign Minister Peres said that the
United States changed its demand that Israel withdraw from the Sector A, Zone
A areas immediately to -- soon, because Foreign Minister Peres says he talked
to the President, said Israel had no intention of staying. Is that an accurate
description of what happened?
MR. FLEISCHER: Let me just characterize to you what the President's response
is to Israel's withdrawal. The President believes that it's a step in the right
direction, and he would like to see it completed in its entirety. He also condemns
the Palestinian Islamic Jihad for their attack in Hadera yesterday, and he does
note that the Palestinian Authority did condemn that attack.
The President again calls on Chairman Arafat to make a 100 percent effort to
reduce the violence in the Middle East.
QUESTION: But what happened to the demand that Israel withdraw immediately?
MR. FLEISCHER: I think I've addressed the question in the totality.
QUESTION: Ari, let me see if I can get you to quantify something. Is this administration
any closer to identifying the source of the anthrax or who was responsible for
sending it? Have you come any closer to making that identification than you
were back when the very first case became apparent in early October?
MR. FLEISCHER: I don't know how to quantify that, John. I mean, this is an investigative
matter. And as the investigators pursue their leads and pore through their evidence,
they make judgments. And I suppose like in any investigation, it's fair to say
that some days they make steps forward, some days they're not able to make steps,
some days they may have steps that don't go forward. So I think it's just an
investigative matter, and the right people are doing the investigating.
QUESTION: Do you have any better understanding of where it came from or who
was responsible than you did back in early October?
MR. FLEISCHER: My statement on Friday, that the government still does not know
whether the source is domestic or foreign, stands.
QUESTION: Ari, back to the subject of immigration. Throughout this months of
the presidency, George W. Bush has always said that he wants legal immigration
to proceed. I'm asking if, after the events of September 11th, is there a delay
in processing either residency or citizenship, or will this continue at the
same pace the President wanted before --
MR. FLEISCHER: Yes, I don't know the answer to that. If you're asking how the
INS is processing its forms, you really need to ask them.
QUESTION: Does the President remain committed to legal immigration --
MR. FLEISCHER: That's what I said.
QUESTION: Let me follow that, Ari. You said a minute ago that immigrants have
offered as much to this country as any other Americans. But we're not talking
at this point about immigrants, we're not talking about Americans. We're talking
about resident aliens, some legal and some not. Do you still not draw a distinction
between those two groups?
MR. FLEISCHER: The President's point is that if anybody is in this country as
a result of our immigration policies that are engaged in terrorist attacks or
came here for the purpose of engaging in terrorism, he knows that the American
people want those people to be caught before they can take another terrorist