United
Kingdom
Prime Minister's Official Spokesman
Lobby Briefing on the US Terror Attacks
September 13, 2001
@11:00 A.M. GMT
The Prime Minister's Official Spokesman (PMOS) advised that the Prime Minister
had spoken to Prime Minister Guterres and the Taoiseach last night. He was expected
to speak to Prime Minister Persson and Prime Minister Aznar this afternoon.
He had chaired COBRA this morning, followed by Cabinet. Needless to say, it
had been a very sombre Cabinet. He had spoken at some length on a number of
the different aspects flowing from Tuesday, namely the military, the political
and diplomatic tracks, the longer term issues relating to tackling global terrorism
and the huge practical arrangements in terms of British casualties and the ramifications
that would have for communities across Britain.
In terms of the military aspect, the American Administration was considering
its response. The Prime Minister had very strongly reiterated the view that
this was a democratic world issue. Although this atrocity had been carried out
in the US and against the US, the Prime Minister said it was against the whole
civilised and democratic world, and from its response so too did the international
community.
The Foreign Secretary had briefed Cabinet on the different diplomatic activities
which had taken place in terms of the General Affairs Council, the NATO meeting
yesterday and the UN Security Council Resolution. All of these were extremely
important and all underlined the international solidarity and resolve on this
issue. In that context, the PMOS advised that there would be a three-minute
silence beginning at 11am (UK time) as part of the Europe-wide initiative.
In terms of tackling global terrorism, the Prime Minister had gone through some
of the issues which would have to be looked at in 'slower time' - who founded
these groups, where they were based etc.
In terms of casualties, the Prime Minister had repeated that it was very difficult
to be precise about numbers and identities. Some were known, but many more were
feared dead. The issue had been raised at the COBRA meeting this morning in
relation to Britons in the US who had been affected by this appalling act and
perhaps had no medical insurance. It had been made clear that the Government
would meet the costs for those individuals. The Prime Minister had also asked
Tessa Jowell to co-ordinate the arrangements for funerals and support arrangements
for families around the country. He had made the point that if this event had
happened in the UK with such a large number of individuals feared dead, one
could only imagine the shock. This would be a tragedy which would touch every
community here as the number of dead and their identities became known.
The Chancellor had briefed Cabinet on the financial situation. He said this
attack had been an attempt to bring a halt to the global economic system. However,
that had not been allowed to happen. The markets in Europe and London had remained
open. Our understanding was that the bond market in the US would be opening
and they were looking to reopen the stock market as soon as they could. The
financial community and systems were resilient.
Stephen Byers had briefed Cabinet on the security arrangements at airports and
the measures we had taken in relation to British airspace. The PMOS advised
that Mr Byers would be attending a meeting of the Transport Council in Brussels
tomorrow evening where the issue of Europe-wide aviation security would be discussed.
Obviously this was an important issue both in Europe and beyond. My Byers had
told Cabinet that we had moved to the highest alert in terms of personal searches
at airports. We would look to scale this down as appropriate and would be kept
under constant review. In the meantime, the no-fly 'box area' over central London
which aircraft were banned from flying over would continue. City Airport, which
was closed today, was likely to open tomorrow with changes to flight paths so
as to redirect planes away from Canary Wharf. The restrictions on light aircraft
and helicopters which had initially been put in place on Tuesday had been lifted
overnight.
The PMOS said that the machinery of COBRA would continue around the clock, twenty-four
hours day, seven days a week for the time being. He was unable to point to any
further Ministerial meetings of COBRA at this stage. Obviously Ministers stood
ready to meet as soon as and whenever it was necessary. He underlined that the
vast majority of the Prime Minister's time was being spent on the issues flowing
from Tuesday's tragic events, and that would continue.
Asked whether the Prime Minister had given any figure for casualties, the PMOS
said that as Jack Straw had said this morning, we were in a position to identify
up to 100 Britons who we believed, with a reasonable degree of certainty, were
missing and presumed dead. However, we had to steel ourselves for the fact that
the death toll was more likely to be several hundred. Asked whether we were
close to releasing a list of names, the PMOS said we were still some way off
from that point. Asked on what basis we had reached the figure of 100, the PMOS
said that a handful were related to flight lists. Obviously calls had been received
at Scotland Yard from concerned friends and relatives. Questioned further, the
PMOS said that we could only estimate the numbers who might have been in the
World Trade Centre at the time and who were still unaccounted for. It was impossible
to confirm any British deaths in the World Trade Centre at this stage for the
reason that only about eighty bodies had been removed from the wreckage so far.
What we could confirm was that 100 people, possibly more, were unaccounted for
and evidence suggested that they had been in the World Trade Centre at the time
of the attacks and they had probably lost their lives. However, until such time
as the bodies were recovered, we couldn't confirm anything. As the Prime Minister
had been briefed at COBRA yesterday, we had to be prepared for current figure
to rise significantly.
Asked if the military discussion in Cabinet had included the question of who
might be responsible, the PMOS said that as journalists would appreciate, he
was unable to go into any detail about military issues or intelligence issues.
That said, work was ongoing as a matter of urgency to identify those who were
responsible. No firm view had been reached at this stage and he was not going
to speculate. Put to him that the military discussion must therefore have been
theoretical, the PMOS repeated that no decisions in terms of those responsible
had been made yet. Asked whether Cabinet had looked at proposals concerning
an early military response, the PMOS said that it was pointless for journalists
to go down that route. It would be for the US to decide what appropriate action
should be taken against those responsible. Questions which flowed from that
concerning Britain?s locus would be discussed at the appropriate time. He repeated
that over the last twenty-four hours we had seen the international community
coming together, showing that it stood behind the US and shared its horror at
what had happened. Asked whether Cabinet discussion had focussed on US or British
military, the PMOS repeated he was not going to get into discussions about military
issues. Put to him that he was the one who had advised that Cabinet had discussed
military action, the PMOS said that didn?t mean he had to go any further. He
had pointed out that there would be a number of issues raised as a result of
events in the US. One of them would be military issues. He repeated that it
would be for the US to decide on an appropriate course of action. As indicated
by conversations which had taken place within NATO and the UN, there was an
ongoing dialogue with allies. Asked how long it might take, the PMOS said he
was not going any further than what he had said.
Put to him that the implication of the NATO Resolution was that we would be
obliged to offer support if the US requested it, the PMOS said that it was the
first time that Article 5 had been invoked since 1949. The terrorist attack
was viewed as an armed attack on the US. This therefore invoked the fundamental
obligation of the Alliance to come to the aid of a member state. The next step
would be for consultation within NATO. We were not at that point yet. As Jack
Straw had underlined this morning, Article 5 wasn?t a blank cheque. Exact support
would be a matter for national determination by national Governments and Prime
Ministers. Questioned further, the PMOS said he was not diminishing in any way,
shape or form the significance of the declaration by NATO. As the Prime Minister
had said, this had been an attack on the whole civilised and democratic world.
As the different declarations from the EU, NATO and the UN had shown, that was
how the international community viewed it as well. Put to him that by stating
our support for the US we had already given the President a blank cheque, the
PMOS said that any level of support the US might ask of us could be discussed
at the appropriate time. The Prime Minister had indicated from the outset that
the US was not alone in this - as demonstrated by all the activity over the
last twenty-four hours. This was not just an outrage against the US. Britain
also had an interest in what had happened in terms of individuals based at the
World Trade Centre but also the wider issues of global terrorism. As the Prime
Minister had said, we stood shoulder to shoulder with the US at this time. Asked
if it would be fair to summarise our position as acknowledging that it was up
to the US to decide on the appropriate response but that we hoped and believed
they would do so in consultation with Britain and other allies, the PMOS reiterated
that it was for the US Administration to decide on what action to take. In the
last twenty-four hours, they had already indicated that they were in discussion
with their allies.
Asked to clarify the range of different issues which had arisen as a result
of the attacks in the US, the PMOS said that as the Prime Minister had said
from the outset, there would be a whole raft of issues which the international
community would have to look at to deal with this new threat. Questions included
where these organisations were based, how they were funded etc. Each issue would
have to be looked at very carefully by the international community as a whole.
Obviously some would have to be looked in 'slower time'. In terms of others
however, action was already being taken, for example the Transport Council was
meeting tomorrow to discuss aviation security.
Questioned repeatedly as to whether we were at war, the PMOS said that being
'at war' were words which had a legal and technical force. He reiterated that
the Cabinet had discussed some of the military issues flowing from the attacks
in the US. It was for the US Administration to decide on the appropriate action
to take against those responsible. Over the last twenty-four hours we had seen
the strongest possible support from the international community and a display
of unity in sharing the horror of what had happened. Asked whether the Prime
Minister had used the word ?war?, the PMOS said not as far as he was aware.
Asked whether we had ever formally declared war on the regime of Slobodan Milosevic,
the PMOS said journalists could look that up in the history books just as well
as he could. Pressed as to whether we were actually at war, the PMOS repeated
that it was for the US Administration to decide what action to take. As we had
seen over the last twenty-four hours, they were approaching this by involving
their allies, talking to them and discussing the issue in all the international
fora. If there were any consequentials for us, they would be considered at the
appropriate time. The threat of global terrorism faced us all. Asked if he was
saying that this dialogue was desirable, the PMOS pointed out that we had already
had dialogue with the US Administration and there had already been a meeting
at the North Atlantic Council. In the end, however, it was for the US to decide
on its response. It was a quite unimaginable situation for them to be dealing
with. The Prime Minister believed that the President and the American people
were showing great resolve and strength in what were very difficult circumstances.
Asked whether Parliament would need to be informed first if the UK decided to
become engaged in some form of military action, the PMOS said that all these
consequentials - should we need to address them - would be addressed at the
appropriate time.
Asked if Cabinet had discussed whether any action would be taken against people
with subversive views who were based in this country, the PMOS said that the
Home Secretary had responsibility for internal security. As we had pointed out,
security had been heightened in this country. The Prime Minister had said that
we had to be vigilant and that we had to put in place the appropriate precautionary
measures. Clearly, if we were dealing with the phenomenon of people who had
no compunction in blowing themselves up we were dealing with a wholly new threat.
To that extent, and as the Prime Minister had said in recent days, this was
an issue which confronted us all. We were all at risk from the threat of global
terrorism. Pressed as to whether any action would be taken against some of the
more 'unsavoury characters on the fringes of the Muslim community', the PMOS
said that wasn't a decision for him. He added that, as had been underlined several
times during cabinet today, it was important to recognise that the attacks had
been an act of terrorism against the world. That included the Muslim faith.
As the Prime Minister had pointed out yesterday, these acts went against the
proper teachings of the Islamic faith. We were determined not to let the terrorists
succeed by setting different religions against one another. The response we
had seen from the Muslim Council and which there had been through letters from
other representatives of the Muslim community which had been published in some
of the papers today was felt to be extremely valuable. Asked why several members
of the Muslim community who belonged to proscribed organisations would appear
not to have been apprehended or expelled from the country, the PMOS pointed
out that appeal procedures could be put in place in terms of extradition. As
Jack Straw had stated this morning, obviously we would have to look at a large
number of different issues flowing from Tuesday's events.
Asked if the Prime Minister was worried about attacks on the British Muslim
community, the PMOS repeated that it was important for everyone to recognise
that what had happened went against all the proper teachings of the Koran and
the Muslim faith. People had seen and heard the condemnation from Muslim communities
around the world. They shared in the horror of the attack - which was just as
much an attack on them as it was on us. It was very important for that point
to be underlined. Extremists should not be allowed to use this as an excuse
to foment their own racial hatred.
Asked about the logistics of flying identified bodies back to the UK given that
flights in and out of the US were restricted, the PMOS said this was one of
the issues to be looked at by Tessa Jowell. It was likely that we would be able
to provide some police support, such as body identification experts. This would
be arranged as soon as we possibly could. There was a whole raft of logistical
issues which we were addressing as a matter of urgency. Asked whether there
might be a mass airlift of British bodies to the UK, the PMOS said we would
want to make sure that the dead returned to the UK with as much dignity as possible.
Asked if this would be paid for by the taxpayer, the PMOS said that it could
be assumed help for those that needed it would be given. He repeated that the
British Government would pay for medical insurance.
Questioned about the debate in the Commons tomorrow, the PMOS said that it was
due to begin at 9.30am. It was felt important for our seat of democracy to be
given the opportunity to address the issues arising from the attacks. Asked
if the three-minute silence would be observed during the debate, the PMOS said
yes.
Asked about the Chancellor's remarks to Cabinet this morning on the economic
impact, the PMOS said that as the Chancellor had said yesterday, it had been
an act which had been aimed at doing as much damage as possible to the global
economy. However, the resilience which had been shown here, in Europe and in
the US had not - and would not - allow that to happen.
END
_____________________________________
Crown copyright material reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO.