Calls on Senate to Act on Terrorism Insurance Legislation
Room 450
Eisenhower Executive Office Building
Washington, D.C.
April 8, 2002
4:27 P.M. EST
Thank you very much. Ed, thank you very much. I didn't realize you were so eloquent.
(Laughter.) But I know you're a good leader, and I know you care deeply about
the people you represent, and so does Jimmy Hoffa and Joe Hunt, and so do the
people -- the employers here. I want to thank you all for coming to help me
talk about this important issue facing the country, and that is how to make
sure people stay working. That's what we're talking about.
You know, the enemy hit us pretty hard on September the 11th. I just came in
from Tennessee, where I was talking about one way to respond to the attacks
is for people to volunteer in their communities and help make their neighborhoods
a better place. I told them, I said, they must have not -- they miscalculated.
They hit us and thought we were so weak that all we would do is probably file
a lawsuit. (Laughter and applause.)
But they found out that we're thinking a little differently in America, and
that when it comes to our freedom we will do what it takes to defend freedom.
And I want to remind you all that this is a long struggle that's going to take
a while, that there are al-Qaida killers still on the loose. There are people
who hate America, they hate what we stand for, they hate the fact that Democrats
and Republicans both love our country equally. They hate the idea that we worship
freely. They hate the concept that we debate issues in open. They hate freedom.
They just hate it. And they are going to try to hurt us; they are.
And the best way to secure the homeland is to find the one by one, and we are.
That's exactly what we're going to do. And the -- we've unleashed the proud
United States military, and the men and women who wear our uniform are really
doing us proud.
I also want you to know that it's just important to know that we don't seek
revenge; we seek justice. That's what we're doing. And we're not conquerors,
but we're liberators. I am really proud of our nation. I'm proud of the fact
that young girls went to school for the first time in Afghanistan. That really
makes me feel really good about what we're doing.
I'm proud about the fact that we're not leaving the country behind, that not
only have we liberated people from the clutches of this barbaric regime, but
we're staying around to help them with their security, and help them to develop
into a nation that can protect herself, and a nation that will be a good neighbor
in an important part of the world.
We have made some pretty good progress in a quick period of time. But you've
got to remember we live in a world in which sometimes, in all due respect, the
media expects things to end quickly. This isn't going to end quickly. So long
as there is terrorists, we need to find them. So long as there is nations which
develop weapons of mass destruction, and therefore try to hold the U.S. or our
friends and allies hostage through blackmail, we're going to have to deal with
it -- just going to have to deal with it. History has called us into action,
and I'm not going to let our children and grandchildren down. And I know you're
not either.
In terms of our economy, no question that the attacks of September the 11th
hurt our economy. I mean, it affected employment in big ways. Many of you know
that. I see Bill Marriott. His business was affected, deeply affected. And thanks
to some focused efforts, things are improving. But as far as I'm concerned,
the notion about where we stand in terms of our economy really depends upon
whether or not people are able to find work, and whether or not they think they're
going to have to work tomorrow. That's how I judge whether or not we're healthy.
If someone is looking for work and can't find work, that means we're not healthy.
If someone is working and they're worried about whether they're going to be
working tomorrow, that means we're not healthy, as far as I'm concerned.
And, therefore, public policy must do everything we can to create an environment
in which jobs are steady and growing. I thought tax relief was very important
to make sure that the environment was such that people could find work.
I know energy policy is very important, and we spent a great deal of time with
Jimmy and Ed talking about how to get a good energy bill out of the Congress.
It's an energy bill, by the way, that is needed more than ever, particularly
given the fact that there's been some threats recently by Saddam Hussein that
he's going to try to cut off energy supply to affect the United States. I mean,
what more reason do we need than to have good energy policy in the United States,
to diversify away from somebody like him?
And we need to do something on terrorism insurance, as well. This is an issue
that I don't think a lot of Americans understand very well, and we're going
to use this opportunity to explain it. I'm going to do my best to explain it.
Tom Ridge and Larry Lindsey will follow up.
It's an issue because it is a jobs issue. If people can't buy insurance on a
construction project, they're not going to build the project. And if they don't
build the project, somebody's not working. That's the simplest way I can describe
the issue at hand.
And we have a lack of insurance coverage now as a result of the enemy attack.
I don't think they actually sat down and said, gosh, if we attack, we'll affect
the insurance industry of America. I think that was an unintended consequence
of theirs. But, nevertheless, it was a consequence.
And we in Washington must deal with it, and must deal with it in a hurry, because
the pace of new construction is dropping dramatically in America. Banks and
investors, and others, will not finance construction projects that do not have
terrorism insurance. In order to build a project, in order to employ people,
you've got to borrow money, and you can't borrow money unless there's adequate
terrorism insurance. And that's not being provided today.
Non-residential construction is down 3 percent compared to January of 2002,
and down 17 percent compared to February of 2001. That's an issue that the Congress
must deal with. If people who want to work can't find work, something is wrong
with the economy. They should not be fooled by the statistics. If people who
are working a construction job are uncertain as to whether or not there will
be a job for them tomorrow, that is a problem, and we need to deal with it.
And when you see construction -- non-residential construction permitting down
to the extent to which it is, it is a problem. And I expect the Congress to
act.
The Hyatt Corporation has acquired a new site for a 1.5 million square foot
office building in downtown Chicago. That ought to be encouraging news. It ought
to be encouraging news for my friend, the mayor. It ought to be encouraging
news for people who wear the hard hat and work, the iron workers and the construction
workers. But they've got a problem finding terrorism coverage, and so they're
not getting financing for the project. Somebody wants to build it; they can't
get the money to do it because the insurance isn't available. This project is
valued at $400 million; will lead to the creation of 2,500 jobs, if the Hyatt
Corporation could get insurance.
There are other examples, as well. A 2 billion resort in Nevada -- you've got
some influence out there, Jimmy -- (laughter) -- could provide 16,000 jobs,
is on hold because they can't get insurance for terrorism. Imagine that. You
know, you've got the chance to employ 16,000 people, but because something hasn't
happened in the United States Congress, it's not going forward. And that's not
right.
We're worried about charities that may be forced to cut back on services to
the needy because of the high cost of insurance. Pension funds for teachers
and other workers that hold real estate assets may experience lower rates of
return because of higher terrorism insurance costs. That affects someone's retirement
system.
The transportation industry will face strains from the lack of affordable terrorism
insurance. Secondly, while we're doing everything we can to stop terrorist attacks,
the economy must be prepared to handle an attack if they do occur. We spend
a lot of time here in Washington sniffing down every lead, looking for every
opportunity to run down a clue -- somebody might be trying to get us. And I
am confident -- I know we're doing everything we can, but I can't predict with
100 percent accuracy whether or not another attack won't occur.
And, therefore, we better find terrorism insurance because, without it, it would
be a catastrophic problem if there is another attack. It would make it really
hard for our economy to recover a second time if there's an attack without adequate
terrorism insurance. I mean, on the one hand we're talking about jobs, and on
the other hand we're talking about recovery if there's an attack.
Now, we passed a bill in the House that basically put the federal government
as a stopgap for terrorism insurance. Above a certain level of claim, the federal
government would step in. And that's important. And now it's in the Senate,
and the Senate needs to respond and act. The Senate needs to get this bill done
quickly. All they've got to do is talk to people in this room, Republicans and
Democrats alike. This isn't a bill that says, gosh, if it passes it'll help
somebody's political party. That's not what this is all about.
This is a bill that helps workers and helps strengthen our economy. This is
an important piece of legislation. I've heard some talk in Capitol Hill that
the facts don't justify this type of legislation, the facts don't justify the
federal government stepping in as a stopgap. They're not looking at the right
set of facts, as far as I'm concerned.
And so I expect, for the good of our economy, and for the good of the country,
that the Senate act. And I want to thank you all for your interest in this bill,
and I ask you to contact members of the United States Senate. We believe there
is bipartisan support for this bill. We believe that if it ever makes it to
the floor, it passes. And I know that we can work with the House version, if
it's somewhat different, to get something done quickly.
This is good for workers. This is good for America. This is a way to really
handle a tough situation and to make our country stronger.
Now, the strength of the country, it really is in the hearts and souls of our
people. People say to me, "Are you an optimistic fellow about the future
of America?" The answer is, "Absolutely. Absolutely." I believe
out of this evil that faced us will come some incredible good. I truly do. I
believe that we'll achieve peace. If we're firm and tough, and stand strong
against terror, continue to lead a coalition of freedom-loving nations, that
we'll achieve peace in areas where people don't think we can achieve peace.
I truly believe that. I know some parts of the world look like they'll never
be peaceful, but I don't believe that.
And I know at home, if we make the right moves, people are going to find work.
But more importantly, I know this country is going to respond to evil because
we're a loving nation and respond to evil by helping people in need.
My hope is that Americans seize this moment and show the world the true face
of America. And it's a face that is really defined by millions of acts of kindness
that take place on a daily basis. It happens when somebody mentors a child,
or a mom tells her baby, "I love you," every day. Or somebody walks
across the street and says to a shut-in, "I care for you." That's
the America I know. That's the America that really is the country that's going
to defeat evil -- by acts of goodness and kindness.
I've never been more upbeat about a nation in my life, because I know the true
strength of the country. And the true strength of the country is the American
people. Thanks for coming by. (Applause.)